An Interesting Bit of Research on Wild Coffee – 103 species of coffee then...how many now?
An annotated taxonomic conspectus of the genus Coffea (coffee) researched and written by Davis, Govaerts, Bridson and Stoffelen was published in the Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society in 2006 (152, 465–512). This article provided a comprehensive overview of the taxonomic history of wild Coffea species, including an enumeration of 103 distinct species and seven infraspecific taxa, focusing on their distribution, diversity, and extinction risk.
Some Key Findings:
Diversity and Distribution: The study identified 41 species in Africa, 59 in Madagascar, and three in the Mascarenes (a group of islands in the Indian Ocean, including Mauritius, Réunion and Rodrigues), confirming that these are the only regions where Coffea species occur naturally. This represents a higher species count than previous estimates. Madagascar, with its diverse forest types, is identified as a major center of Coffea diversity, along with Cameroon and Tanzania. Notably, no species are shared between these three regions, highlighting high levels of endemism (100% in each area). While some species like C. liberica and C. canephora (robusta coffee) have wider distributions, most are narrowly endemic, confined to small geographic areas. Species inhabiting riverine habitats tend to have broader distributions than their non-riverine relatives.
Extinction Threat: A significant finding was that 72 of the 103 species (almost 70%) are classified as "Threatened" according to IUCN criteria. This includes 14 Critically Endangered, 35 Endangered, and 23 Vulnerable species. While no species were confirmed extinct, C. fragilis has not been relocated, and C. heterocalyx was considered to be on the verge of extinction.
Conservation Challenges: The study emphasized the lack of a coordinated conservation strategy for Coffeagenetic resources. Both ex situ (e.g., seed banks) and in situ (e.g., protected areas) conservation efforts faced significant challenges:
Ex situ limitations: Existing field genebanks are declining due to financial difficulties. While collections exist for commercially important species like C. arabica, C. canephora, and C. liberica, their genetic diversity is limited compared to wild populations. Furthermore, Coffea seeds exhibit recalcitrant or intermediate storage behavior, making long-term preservation difficult. Alternative methods like in vitroslow growth and cryopreservation were expensive and required further research.
In situ absence: Critically, there are no established genetic reserves specifically designated for wild Coffeaspecies (except maybe in Costa Rica where there is a collection of African coffee species managed by CATIE). This lack of in situ conservation is attributed partly to a lack of awareness among land managers and decision-makers about the presence and importance of these resources.
Focus on Narrow Endemics: The study highlighted the urgent need to conserve narrowly endemic species, particularly those in Madagascar, the Mascarenes, and eastern Africa, especially those located outside existing protected areas.
Call for Action and Resource: The study provided a baseline for future conservation efforts. It emphasized the need to prioritize threatened species and suggested using the IUCN Red List categories and regional checklists for conservation planning. While the commercially important species deserve attention, the study stressed the importance of conserving the broader genetic diversity of wild Coffea for long-term sustainability.
As of May 2024, further work by other researchers on the genus Coffea have increased the number of coffee species identified from the 103 species documented in 2006 by Davis et al, to 124 recognized species. The discovery of these new species, particularly in regions like Madagascar and other parts of Africa and ongoing research and exploration continue to enhance our understanding of Coffea diversity, which is vital for conservation and the development of resilient coffee cultivars.